Review Forms

REVIEW FORM - Articles

 

1. Is the work relevant and innovative for its field of study?

2. Is the title clear and appropriate to the work?

3. Does the abstract clearly and objectively describe the content of the article?

4. Is the text written clearly and objectively?

5. Is the text supported by updated, relevant and appropriate references to the topic?

6. Is the research problem clearly and coherently expressed?

7. Are the methodology comprehensively described and appropriate to the proposed objectives?

8. Does it adequately address ethical issues?

9. Is the analysis and discussion of the results consistent with the objectives and theoretical framework of the study?

10. Are the conclusions coherent and justified by the results?

11. Are citations and references in accordance with APA 7?

12. GLOBAL RATING

Rate the article from 1 (very poor) to 5 (excellent) on each of the following topics:

Interest

Quality

Originality

13. Recommendation

14. Comments for the authors

15. Comments for the editors (confidential)

 

REVIEW FORM - Interviews

 

1. Is the work relevant and innovative for its field of study?

2. Is the title clear and appropriate to the work?

3. Is the text written clearly and objectively?

4. Are the questions pertinent and do it help to obtain meaningful information?

5. Are citations and references in accordance with APA 7?

6. GLOBAL RATING

Rate the interview from 1 (very poor) to 5 (excellent) on each of the following topics:

Interest

Quality

Originality

7. Recommendation

8. Comments for the authors

9. Comments for the editors (confidential)

 

REVIEW FORM - Reviews

 

1. Rate the review from 1 (very poor) to 5 (excellent) on each of the following topics:

Interest

Quality

Originality

Relationship between the work and the scope of the journal

2. Is the text written clearly and objectively?

3. Is the text supported by updated, relevant and appropriate references to
the topic?

4. Are citations and references in accordance with APA 7?

5. Recommendation

6. Comments for the authors

7. Comments for the editors (confidential)

 

REVIEW FORM - Experience Reports

 

1. Is the work relevant and innovative for its field of study?

2. Is the title clear and appropriate?

3. Does the abstract clearly and objectively describe the content of the work?

4. Is the text written clearly and objectively?

5. Is the text supported by updated, relevant and appropriate references to the topic?

6. Are the conclusions coherent and justified?

7. Are citations and references in accordance with APA 7?

8. GLOBAL RATING

Rate the work from 1 (very poor) to 5 (excellent) on each of the following topics:

Interest

Quality

Originality

9. Recommendation

10. Comments for the authors

11. Comments for the editors (confidential)